Blocktent on Nostr: Normally if Alice was to spend from multiple UTXOs, she'd sign each with a signature. ...
Normally if Alice was to spend from multiple UTXOs, she'd sign each with a signature.
With CISA, these signatures could be aggregated into a single, compact signature reducing transaction size and enabling higher throughput by utilising well understood properties of Schnorr sig.
Afaik this aggregation uses a concept similar to MuSig, where multiple public keys are combined into one.
Alice would then sign with a private key corresponding to this aggregate public key.
What would this akshually enable?
• Privacy: More efficient CoinJoins.
By reducing the signature size, CISA could make privacy-enhancing transactions like CoinJoins cheaper encouraging use and privacy as standard.
• Cost: Lower transaction fees due to smaller tx sizes.
With CISA, these signatures could be aggregated into a single, compact signature reducing transaction size and enabling higher throughput by utilising well understood properties of Schnorr sig.
Afaik this aggregation uses a concept similar to MuSig, where multiple public keys are combined into one.
Alice would then sign with a private key corresponding to this aggregate public key.
What would this akshually enable?
• Privacy: More efficient CoinJoins.
By reducing the signature size, CISA could make privacy-enhancing transactions like CoinJoins cheaper encouraging use and privacy as standard.
• Cost: Lower transaction fees due to smaller tx sizes.