Joost Jager [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2023-06-20 📝 Original message: Hi Antoine, On Sun, Jun ...

📅 Original date posted:2023-06-20
📝 Original message:
Hi Antoine,

On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 10:32 PM Antoine Riard <antoine.riard at gmail.com>
wrote:

> > * Opt-in annex (every input must commit to an annex even if its is
> empty) -> make sure existing multi-party protocols remain unaffected
>
> By requiring every input to commit to an annex even if it is empty, do you
> mean rejecting a transaction where the minimal annex with its 0x50 tag is
> absent ?
>

No what I meant, and what was mentioned by Greg in a previous email, is
that either none of the inputs have an annex, or all of them have one.

So if you're part of a multi-party transaction and you don't commit to an
annex, you can be sure that no version of that tx will appear where another
signer surprises you with a potentially large annex.

For future protocols that rely on the annex, everyone would need to opt-in
by committing to an annex (which can be empty just to signal opt-in).

Joost
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20230620/60810c0a/attachment.html>;