mae(Uppercase) on Nostr: npub1z64vr…rsxul npub1tva8g…g2yl5 I am overwhelmed by the amount of replies, so ...
npub1z64vrw2nzatdeucd0gkftmyywv5lwh9vzl8clj06ap5gxnfl04ssnrsxul (npub1z64…sxul) npub1tva8g98fx0fks0pt38vr75tv02t30qd5ev7n5v7fcpl6t44hf7kqgg2yl5 (npub1tva…2yl5) I am overwhelmed by the amount of replies, so I'm going to try to address everything here.
First of all I'm sorry about the harassment from kiwifarms. I haven't heard about that but I fully believe you. I do not want to defend the microg devs in any way, the only reason I am still having this discussion is to explain myself, not them.
Second: the language I used, talking about freedom was wrong. I used freedom in the non-pragmatic extremist sense, which I actually think is quite stupid(the gnu in my display name is a joke). I'm sorry, I've edited my post to say: "It does not care about running exclusively free-software". It was a quick reply I wrote in 15 seconds without thinking, I apologize.
Third thing: Microg is less secure than Play Services
What I'm trying to argue is that microg by itself is more secure than play services. It might be less secure than your sandboxed play services, but if similar sandboxing work was done for microg the two would be more-or-less equivalent.
When I say "the statement from graphene's team" I'm referring to the only statements I could find. So:
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/4290-sandboxed-microg/17
and
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/4290-sandboxed-microg/10
Every single time I could find you talking about microg your statements(at least to me) feel extremely condescending and reads as a critique of microg as a whole, not just microg running on grapheneos.
First of all I'm sorry about the harassment from kiwifarms. I haven't heard about that but I fully believe you. I do not want to defend the microg devs in any way, the only reason I am still having this discussion is to explain myself, not them.
Second: the language I used, talking about freedom was wrong. I used freedom in the non-pragmatic extremist sense, which I actually think is quite stupid(the gnu in my display name is a joke). I'm sorry, I've edited my post to say: "It does not care about running exclusively free-software". It was a quick reply I wrote in 15 seconds without thinking, I apologize.
Third thing: Microg is less secure than Play Services
What I'm trying to argue is that microg by itself is more secure than play services. It might be less secure than your sandboxed play services, but if similar sandboxing work was done for microg the two would be more-or-less equivalent.
When I say "the statement from graphene's team" I'm referring to the only statements I could find. So:
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/4290-sandboxed-microg/17
and
https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/4290-sandboxed-microg/10
Every single time I could find you talking about microg your statements(at least to me) feel extremely condescending and reads as a critique of microg as a whole, not just microg running on grapheneos.