Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27 📝 Original message:>That requires an ...

📅 Original date posted:2015-06-27
📝 Original message:>That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing
the whole community.

I'll take that as a "no". But it's a strange bar to set: perfect
representation of entire community. By that token, nobody can say anything
is controversial if a different group is disagreeing.

Greg

On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:25 AM, NxtChg <nxtchg at hush.com> wrote:

>
> On 6/27/2015 at 3:18 PM, "Greg Sanders" <gsanders87 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Can we agree n-1 dev Nacks would be a controversial hard fork?
>
> That requires an assumption that all developers are perfectly representing
> the whole community.
>
> And no shady lobbying behind the scenes too.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150627/a57d0719/attachment.html>;