miguel bracamontes on Nostr: there's this empty discussion (https://infosec.pub/post/10973669) about the past ...
there's this empty discussion (https://infosec.pub/post/10973669) about the past [@lori](https://hackers.town/@lori) situation on the vlad harassment. i commented the following before the absolute buffoon of [@dgerard](https://awful.systems/u/dgerard) removed my comment saying "that’s wonderfully both-sides of you, thank you for your contribution":
"vlad should’ve stopped at the first time lori told him to stop, definitely, but this whole thing just turned into something else.
and, what surprises me the most, is this attitude of “either you are completely defending lori or else you are a transphobe, queer hater, dehumanizing piece of shit”. my opinion goes, not to defend the actual piece of shit ceo, but to defend our opinions against anyone, and lori failed to do so. lori’s attitude comes closer to throwing a stone and hiding the hand, even though i agree with lori’s point.
by no means the poster is forced to debate, i recognize that. and if lori did not want to, perfectly fine. respectable. but the action (and public posts) are still subject to criticism, like mine, that goes against the fact that saying something controversial and then proceeding to be shocked like “omg, how odd, is people being critical of what i said? outrageous!” is funny. and the mod banning and removing what he feels are apologist crap is the cherry on top. authoritarian vibes all around."
lol, david; not even close
sad to see this kind of people modding supposedly open forums.
"vlad should’ve stopped at the first time lori told him to stop, definitely, but this whole thing just turned into something else.
and, what surprises me the most, is this attitude of “either you are completely defending lori or else you are a transphobe, queer hater, dehumanizing piece of shit”. my opinion goes, not to defend the actual piece of shit ceo, but to defend our opinions against anyone, and lori failed to do so. lori’s attitude comes closer to throwing a stone and hiding the hand, even though i agree with lori’s point.
by no means the poster is forced to debate, i recognize that. and if lori did not want to, perfectly fine. respectable. but the action (and public posts) are still subject to criticism, like mine, that goes against the fact that saying something controversial and then proceeding to be shocked like “omg, how odd, is people being critical of what i said? outrageous!” is funny. and the mod banning and removing what he feels are apologist crap is the cherry on top. authoritarian vibes all around."
lol, david; not even close
sad to see this kind of people modding supposedly open forums.