Dr. Fernando Morales on Nostr: You mean public land? From what I understand, and correct me if I'm wrong, you're ...
You mean public land?
From what I understand, and correct me if I'm wrong, you're arguing that we need a government to protect a region of land and secure the borders, because individuals cannot do it as efficiently. So anyone arguing for anarchy, is going to get that piece of land invaded or overrun by immigrants. Is that correct?
Also some questions to understand the context:
-You mention "just one guy", are we talking about 1 anarchist living amongst statists or a hypothecal area of land inhabited by anarcho-capitalists? I wouldn't demolish a nation at the snap of a finger right now if I could, people don't understand economics and property rights, so it would all devolve into chaos and you'd most likely get another state to replace the previous one. I'm more for slowly defanging the state initially (minarchism or libertarianism), parallel economies, separating money and state, monarchies replacing democracies would be interesting, etc. Then and only then do I think that anarchism over an area of land makes sense.
-What are group property rights? Who decides what happens or is done with the property in the group? Can you take your property within this group property along with you if want to opt out?
From what I understand, and correct me if I'm wrong, you're arguing that we need a government to protect a region of land and secure the borders, because individuals cannot do it as efficiently. So anyone arguing for anarchy, is going to get that piece of land invaded or overrun by immigrants. Is that correct?
Also some questions to understand the context:
-You mention "just one guy", are we talking about 1 anarchist living amongst statists or a hypothecal area of land inhabited by anarcho-capitalists? I wouldn't demolish a nation at the snap of a finger right now if I could, people don't understand economics and property rights, so it would all devolve into chaos and you'd most likely get another state to replace the previous one. I'm more for slowly defanging the state initially (minarchism or libertarianism), parallel economies, separating money and state, monarchies replacing democracies would be interesting, etc. Then and only then do I think that anarchism over an area of land makes sense.
-What are group property rights? Who decides what happens or is done with the property in the group? Can you take your property within this group property along with you if want to opt out?