Dan Gillmor on Nostr: The NY Times does triple-backflip contortions to avoid mentioning the most likely ...
The NY Times does triple-backflip contortions to avoid mentioning the most likely explanation for the Trump-appointed federal judge's in-your-face bias in the classified-documents case -- a blizzard of rulings in Trump's favor.
By far the most likely explanation is also, per Occam's Razor, the simplest one:
For whatever reason, she's in the bag for Trump.
Published at
2024-06-21 02:50:54Event JSON
{
"id": "22bef45c5cdce984c1da7167ab571639fb6186dc98921b7932f05fa9e911307b",
"pubkey": "012f3e11fdc1546a97c2791662d1ae6ab1a0d3ec3fe3ae31e861e59cfde1e3ed",
"created_at": 1718938254,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/dangillmor/statuses/112652337467030862",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "The NY Times does triple-backflip contortions to avoid mentioning the most likely explanation for the Trump-appointed federal judge's in-your-face bias in the classified-documents case -- a blizzard of rulings in Trump's favor.\n\nBy far the most likely explanation is also, per Occam's Razor, the simplest one:\n\nFor whatever reason, she's in the bag for Trump.\n\nhttps://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/112/652/332/522/732/961/original/697528545a7e1205.png",
"sig": "bee7424e72a23690dab9216cec15449e07cc6e4fc760f846544e6f790baf9be43efe92af048eb4203083cec04b18e42ac16d720efa73f4555f015b43296cca63"
}
