I understand on Nostr: Yes, and yet all the article says is that the reason for the visits is "unclear". ...
Yes, and yet all the article says is that the reason for the visits is "unclear".
They spend space in the article on possible reasons for the visits, such as an "array of neurologists who have not personally examined Mr. Biden"
They should have spent article space talking about the Parkinson's law and positing the visits could have been consultations on the bill... and perhaps even followed up with other people known to have been involved in the bill.
They did not.
They spend space in the article on possible reasons for the visits, such as an "array of neurologists who have not personally examined Mr. Biden"
They should have spent article space talking about the Parkinson's law and positing the visits could have been consultations on the bill... and perhaps even followed up with other people known to have been involved in the bill.
They did not.