Rusty Russell [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2017-12-15 📝 Original message: Jonathan Underwood ...
📅 Original date posted:2017-12-15
📝 Original message:
Jonathan Underwood <junderwood at bitcoinbank.co.jp> writes:
> Additional comment: we should make a requirement to hide text in the
> description under certain conditions.
>
> ie. "A reader MUST hide information surrounded by curly brackets {}
> including
> the brackets themselves from the UI, and only make the information avaiable
> internally."
>
> I think a lot of people will want to include extra data in their payment
> requests' description.
>
> I think HTLC.ME uses it and maybe bitrefill? (correct me if I'm wrong.)
OK, HTLC.ME (cool site!) uses a description of:
{"generic_id":"ada00363-50b6-4281-82dd-d274393439f1"}
Which I really don't understand. This field is literally only to
display to the user, for them to validate it's what they wanted. The
recipient never gets it back.
If I knew who ran HTLC.ME, I'd ask them to fix it: they should have a
description entry field in their "Request Payment" form. It could
default to "Test payment ada00363-50b6-4281-82dd-d274393439f1", but
they're in spec violation at the moment.
> Perhaps adding an "extra data" tag?
Easy to do, if I knew why they wanted it.
Thanks!
Rusty.
📝 Original message:
Jonathan Underwood <junderwood at bitcoinbank.co.jp> writes:
> Additional comment: we should make a requirement to hide text in the
> description under certain conditions.
>
> ie. "A reader MUST hide information surrounded by curly brackets {}
> including
> the brackets themselves from the UI, and only make the information avaiable
> internally."
>
> I think a lot of people will want to include extra data in their payment
> requests' description.
>
> I think HTLC.ME uses it and maybe bitrefill? (correct me if I'm wrong.)
OK, HTLC.ME (cool site!) uses a description of:
{"generic_id":"ada00363-50b6-4281-82dd-d274393439f1"}
Which I really don't understand. This field is literally only to
display to the user, for them to validate it's what they wanted. The
recipient never gets it back.
If I knew who ran HTLC.ME, I'd ask them to fix it: they should have a
description entry field in their "Request Payment" form. It could
default to "Test payment ada00363-50b6-4281-82dd-d274393439f1", but
they're in spec violation at the moment.
> Perhaps adding an "extra data" tag?
Easy to do, if I knew why they wanted it.
Thanks!
Rusty.