Pieter Wuille [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2014-01-27 📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2014-01-27
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Kevin Greene <kgreenek at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for an error field.
Agree, I think we need a way for client applications to interpret the response.
> Should the wallet broadcast the transaction to the bitcoin network when it
> receives an ACK, or always assume that the merchant server will do that?
In my opinion, that should be the primary meaning of receiving an ACK:
acknowledgement that the receiver takes responsibility for getting the
transaction confirmed (to the extent possible, of course).
--
Pieter
📝 Original message:On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Kevin Greene <kgreenek at gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for an error field.
Agree, I think we need a way for client applications to interpret the response.
> Should the wallet broadcast the transaction to the bitcoin network when it
> receives an ACK, or always assume that the merchant server will do that?
In my opinion, that should be the primary meaning of receiving an ACK:
acknowledgement that the receiver takes responsibility for getting the
transaction confirmed (to the extent possible, of course).
--
Pieter