📅 Original date posted:2013-10-29 📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED ...

Peter Todd [ARCHIVE] /

npub1m23…2np2

2023-06-07 15:08:13

in reply to nevent1q…77el

📅 Original date posted:2013-10-29
📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:52:31AM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:
>> For block 0x11 again shall there be a separate code for "block is
>from the
>> future"? We don't want to lose the nVersion field to people just
>using it
>> for nonsense, so does it make sense to reject blocks that claim to be
>v2 or
>> v3?
>
>That would prevent us from using nVersion as a soft-forking mechanism.

Actually, that statement didn't go far enough: rejecting blocks with nVersions that you don't expect is a hard fork.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: APG v1.0.9

iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJSb544MxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8
cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhfuGCADHB+5WZ3oSRCCYgId+
5c4rxZHjjmXXIVOlXySjoRQ20JUnGbkUqN057VlutYbWaGV7OqR0oQyzh0LGpMdL
BU9hg8XoHbyIvA0WhCfEJvFzkwseN8Ac77UxtV3leBpBkSzjqlMS9QBGU6L5rw2U
uo8Sd7bQaqkadOPode3MMWDtmmqAZaj2dN02w/8C1rRna3SrbYRVYbaVAuN9yREO
99DOGEM2V7ni+eo4sQoxP2jf8vmNzy1EuQH8v1OloPgcpxl/GkLVXzQh4ZfO1ApE
UVKBo93oT34Tce9LwZy+k8XpeCvBRJ/+QwsbAAgdVYKr8KmRcAW4oR2KN7Y0jjq4
44xU
=OaON
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Author Public Key

npub1m230cem2yh3mtdzkg32qhj73uytgkyg5ylxsu083n3tpjnajxx4qqa2np2

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:08:13

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "28986a0be030d83836c1b0dafcce275a8b569bfbcf4355faa95f00652a6a6ec2", "pubkey": "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa", "created_at": 1686150493, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "3817326e0aa3f4776a8ff8e7526de3607739981db781c73ec645db4eafebe42c", "", "root" ], [ "e", "2f456b87500c645e6285f2aefc859b438d590d121550c6d1bb899a772905cd6b", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "daa2fc676a25e3b5b45644540bcbd1e1168b111427cd0e3cf19c56194fb231aa" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2013-10-29\n📝 Original message:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----\nHash: SHA256\n\n\n\nPeter Todd \u003cpete at petertodd.org\u003e wrote:\n\u003eOn Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:52:31AM +0100, Mike Hearn wrote:\n\u003e\u003e For block 0x11 again shall there be a separate code for \"block is\n\u003efrom the\n\u003e\u003e future\"? We don't want to lose the nVersion field to people just\n\u003eusing it\n\u003e\u003e for nonsense, so does it make sense to reject blocks that claim to be\n\u003ev2 or\n\u003e\u003e v3?\n\u003e\n\u003eThat would prevent us from using nVersion as a soft-forking mechanism.\n\nActually, that statement didn't go far enough: rejecting blocks with nVersions that you don't expect is a hard fork.\n-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\nVersion: APG v1.0.9\n\niQFQBAEBCAA6BQJSb544MxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8\ncGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhfuGCADHB+5WZ3oSRCCYgId+\n5c4rxZHjjmXXIVOlXySjoRQ20JUnGbkUqN057VlutYbWaGV7OqR0oQyzh0LGpMdL\nBU9hg8XoHbyIvA0WhCfEJvFzkwseN8Ac77UxtV3leBpBkSzjqlMS9QBGU6L5rw2U\nuo8Sd7bQaqkadOPode3MMWDtmmqAZaj2dN02w/8C1rRna3SrbYRVYbaVAuN9yREO\n99DOGEM2V7ni+eo4sQoxP2jf8vmNzy1EuQH8v1OloPgcpxl/GkLVXzQh4ZfO1ApE\nUVKBo93oT34Tce9LwZy+k8XpeCvBRJ/+QwsbAAgdVYKr8KmRcAW4oR2KN7Y0jjq4\n44xU\n=OaON\n-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----", "sig": "2ea266d172ea48d307f38e177094d6e0dbb19f4f90915fab403f3d5c0e34b540e94e6e1e00e6ffb6d7b8cb2330dd34a557cee9dd26d16f00b6c1a8a794629f44" }