Greg Sanders [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2022-10-11 📝 Original message:There are a number of ...

📅 Original date posted:2022-10-11
📝 Original message:There are a number of issues with adding arbitrary size restrictions to
consensus(I personally think it's additional complexity for negative gain),
but most of all this may resolve in burned coins.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 6:22 AM Loki Verloren via bitcoin-dev <
bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

>
> The recent 998 of 999 multisig segwit transaction highlights a problem
> with BIP144. As the solution applied for btcd shows, effectively a single
> transaction witness can be the same as the maximum block size.
>
> 11000 bytes may not be so unreasonable but now there is a special case
> with a block over 33k worth of witness data.
>
> A concrete limit should be set on the maximum size of a transaction
> witness, and this should be discussed in a more general sense about total
> transaction sizes.
>
> In the absence of a specification, it becomes impossible to properly
> implement and the status quo devolves to the actual implementation in the
> bitcoin core repository code.
>
> I think the weight calculation should escalate exponentially to discourage
> putting transactions like this on the chain. The price was equivalent to
> about $5 to do this.
>
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20221011/7e9f32ea/attachment.html>;