Matt Blaze on Nostr: I used the 32mm Rodenstock here. I could have just barely squeezed it into a single ...
I used the 32mm Rodenstock here. I could have just barely squeezed it into a single frame with the wider-angle 23mm, except that the 23 doesn't have a large enough image circle to accommodate the vertical shift needed to keep the vertical lines from converging. The 32 has a much larger image circle, and so stitching with it yields a wider angle of view than I can obtain with the 23 (even with stitching). More pixels, too.
Published at
2024-04-10 14:27:50Event JSON
{
"id": "251b048ba75869429a95fb0a60da25ba4df20c06987b4c0a2356403145d9b18c",
"pubkey": "6f9089e5e6810f9514a501f04b94466f7473f4db7fb0e9e389966dc7cfb76251",
"created_at": 1712759270,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"ccfee5798548011ad2bb3f402ad2b17f8e9ffc991311ab5ce89041853221f9b8",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://federate.social/users/mattblaze/statuses/112247391544155914",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "I used the 32mm Rodenstock here. I could have just barely squeezed it into a single frame with the wider-angle 23mm, except that the 23 doesn't have a large enough image circle to accommodate the vertical shift needed to keep the vertical lines from converging. The 32 has a much larger image circle, and so stitching with it yields a wider angle of view than I can obtain with the 23 (even with stitching). More pixels, too.",
"sig": "caa9fdd9416d68503f66cebe20e57e3bfec5965ff313f295071f194c8f3fab9fcbfe4ef75ccc160f4890ddb6e4458971281de61bb09e634bb81475f4d6e846d6"
}
