Fir :transspecies star: on Nostr: Sofia >It is an assumption extrapolated from pro-c ideology that adults can receive ...
Sofia (npub1qxx…u6la)
>It is an assumption extrapolated from pro-c ideology that adults can receive consent from youths.
>your reply was the irrelevant part, it was about what you believe the AOC should be.
>That would imply prohibition on all adult sex would also advance youth liberation somehow. There are adults that other adults are unable to recieve consent from, this mostly comes down to neurological/psychological state, it significantly decreases the chances of them being raped, and helps when they are, why should it be different in this case. I said it was at the center of your stance on youthlib not that you were saying it was the center of youth liberation. Whether it was an assumption or not, proving it was an assumption does not show that pro-c is inherent to youthlib.
>bad or good thought experiment, that still doesn't prove your assertion.
>not that I think that could be untrue, but proof and how?
Sorry for the curt replies, but it's really getting to the point where your assertion needs to be proven, as you are in favor of an assertion (pro-c ideology is inherent to youthlib.) In what tangible way does allowing adults to have sex with youths tie into equalizing the power of adults over youths, instead of being a result of that equalization of power?
>It is an assumption extrapolated from pro-c ideology that adults can receive consent from youths.
>your reply was the irrelevant part, it was about what you believe the AOC should be.
>That would imply prohibition on all adult sex would also advance youth liberation somehow. There are adults that other adults are unable to recieve consent from, this mostly comes down to neurological/psychological state, it significantly decreases the chances of them being raped, and helps when they are, why should it be different in this case. I said it was at the center of your stance on youthlib not that you were saying it was the center of youth liberation. Whether it was an assumption or not, proving it was an assumption does not show that pro-c is inherent to youthlib.
>bad or good thought experiment, that still doesn't prove your assertion.
>not that I think that could be untrue, but proof and how?
Sorry for the curt replies, but it's really getting to the point where your assertion needs to be proven, as you are in favor of an assertion (pro-c ideology is inherent to youthlib.) In what tangible way does allowing adults to have sex with youths tie into equalizing the power of adults over youths, instead of being a result of that equalization of power?