Brunswick on Nostr: NVK's claim that I read was that someone was infringing on the specific trademark ...
NVK's claim that I read was that someone was infringing on the specific trademark blockclock. Trademark does not cover a process, nor a copyright. It appears that BTCclock created a competing product with original authorship. He mentions that he didn't reverse engineer a blockclock, but even if he did, that's perfectly legal within the DMCA. Copyright and trademark do not protect the duplication of an idea. So either I misread NVK's statement that his actual trademark was being infringed upon and he implied that that trademark was specifically "blockclock", or he is not acting in good faith.
Published at
2024-11-19 16:38:51Event JSON
{
"id": "27feff9a9f77adb3531c8bf3685a408b8dc4d31ee674510f495d00985c9011eb",
"pubkey": "c1e9ab3a56a2ab6ca4bebf44ea64b2fda40ac6311e886ba86b4652169cb56b43",
"created_at": 1732034331,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"fd488342a48ebd05f9636e420a285af505c3a8b164d32f3f90c4cc742c2c2699",
"",
"root"
],
[
"p",
"b5127a08cf33616274800a4387881a9f98e04b9c37116e92de5250498635c422"
],
[
"p",
"ccaa58e37c99c85bc5e754028a718bd46485e5d3cb3345691ecab83c755d48cc"
]
],
"content": "NVK's claim that I read was that someone was infringing on the specific trademark blockclock. Trademark does not cover a process, nor a copyright. It appears that BTCclock created a competing product with original authorship. He mentions that he didn't reverse engineer a blockclock, but even if he did, that's perfectly legal within the DMCA. Copyright and trademark do not protect the duplication of an idea. So either I misread NVK's statement that his actual trademark was being infringed upon and he implied that that trademark was specifically \"blockclock\", or he is not acting in good faith.",
"sig": "3b047839ce63f9dba1e136c94bae610f981b2a788be404f63d2779917d18fe87ed5eb546adde108dceb67253fa1d98968cf773ea232832ed3f4596567a667a63"
}
