Adam Back / @adam3us on Nostr: **the confidential transactions ring signature is simpler than it sounds, though ...
**the confidential transactions ring signature is simpler than it sounds, though cleverly micro-optimized. the building block is the schnorr signature, which looks like this c=H(r*G+c*Q) where Q is the public key, Q=x*G, x is the private key. you prove**
the confidential transactions ring signature is simpler than it sounds, though cleverly micro-optimized. the building block is the schnorr signature, which looks like this c=H(r*G+c*Q) where Q is the public key, Q=x*G, x is the private key. you prove
nitter.net/volker_btc/status/1605956364508925954#m**the confidential transactions ring signature is simpler than it sounds, though cleverly micro-optimized. the building block is the schnorr signature, which looks like this c=H(r*G+c*Q) where Q is the public key, Q=x*G, x is the private key. you pr…
https://nitter.net/adam3us/status/1605982443382546433#m
the confidential transactions ring signature is simpler than it sounds, though cleverly micro-optimized. the building block is the schnorr signature, which looks like this c=H(r*G+c*Q) where Q is the public key, Q=x*G, x is the private key. you prove
nitter.net/volker_btc/status/1605956364508925954#m**the confidential transactions ring signature is simpler than it sounds, though cleverly micro-optimized. the building block is the schnorr signature, which looks like this c=H(r*G+c*Q) where Q is the public key, Q=x*G, x is the private key. you pr…
https://nitter.net/adam3us/status/1605982443382546433#m