OceanSlim on Nostr: Not ending their life is "forcing them to be born". Life is in fact preferable to ...
Not ending their life is "forcing them to be born". Life is in fact preferable to death.
quoting nevent1q…wydwI am not a subscriber to Malthusian population theory, the earth has more than enough resources to support many more people than we have today if we use the resources wisely which the FIAT system prevents. You seem to associate with me with beliefs I do not hold, this is a failure on your part to have an honest argument.
I do not believe that anyone has the right to use someone else's body without their consent. I do not care if the person needs the other person's body to survive, they cannot use it without consent. Just as I do not subscribe to the belief that forced organ donation or forced blood transfusions are good even if they would reduce death overall. Removing or not providing consent can sometimes result in death, as it does in the cases of abortion or a lack of available organ donors, but that does not supercede the importance of consent in our dealings with each other.
I do not care if the person dependant is created through the actions of the other person who's body is needed to survive, because no action gives automatic consent to the future usage of their body by another person against their will.
You seem to believe that forcing children to be born to someone who does not want them and cannot support them is preferable to not being born at all. It is not.
Unwanted children are at much higher risks of every type of abuse, physical, mental, emotional, sexual. Unwanted children are at a much higher risk of being human trafficked. I would rather not be born than to be born into those sets of circumstances.
You speak on a subject without compassion for those involved, and crusade on behalf of those who cannot give their opinion otherwise.
You advocate non-consensual forced usage of another person's body against their will. That is slavery. You sir, are in favor of slavery.