Event JSON
{
"id": "477a711da1f3329995d46fcd251736570ddbf6a2b33afed458eb9a677ea34d60",
"pubkey": "1e464f12800dbf884cc4c26a10751318ab9de589f21df3125732e3988e5a1b90",
"created_at": 1725519264,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"e6dba956439c80d64cb602d6c820ce13a27815429abf0e01edf4679bfb723763"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://lawsocial.org/@sushant/113083630494013624",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://lawsocial.org/users/sushant/statuses/113083630494013624",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://lawsocial.org/users/sushant/statuses/113083630494013624",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Big setback for nostr:npub1umd6j4jrnjqdvn9kqttvsgxwzw38s92zn2lsuq0d73neh7mjxa3sa8wfr7 as the Appeals court upholds District Court ruling that digitizing books through scanning does not create derivative work and striking down Controlled Digital Lending as not fair use https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/industry-news/publisher-news/article/95865-appeals-court-upholds-decision-against-internet-archive-s-book-scanning-program.html",
"sig": "bd56809a5c42bf6d2f7980981194f993063fcee6bb1497f09b619ba24001f87f838ac1f0480567fa850beb5af4b101f515e13dcf3bbd6714637d9aa6d3e380ce"
}