Laxystem (Masto/Glitch) on Nostr: clearly, there's been a misunderstanding. I'm not implying here what is right and ...
clearly, there's been a misunderstanding.
I'm not implying here what is right and wrong within the actual conflict. I'm talking about how people pick a side, without researching its history, merely for reasons of, in this case, racism.
Israel has killed more, yes; but even that is *somewhat* wrong in this context -- a context of who *would* kill more. And regardless, Hamas still killed.
It is true, no one picks a side purely off of racism; but it is often a huge factor. The question of, "who *would* you support?" doesn't apply to the actual conflict as the Likud has indeed killed more, factually. It is not a point regarding who's right and wrong, and I think you missed that. But it comes up a lot. And there are people that answer "Hamas".
I'm not making a point about the conflict; I'm making a point about how people choose who (if any) to support.
Question is, did you misunderstand me, or do you fundamentally disagree with me somewhere.
I'm not implying here what is right and wrong within the actual conflict. I'm talking about how people pick a side, without researching its history, merely for reasons of, in this case, racism.
Israel has killed more, yes; but even that is *somewhat* wrong in this context -- a context of who *would* kill more. And regardless, Hamas still killed.
It is true, no one picks a side purely off of racism; but it is often a huge factor. The question of, "who *would* you support?" doesn't apply to the actual conflict as the Likud has indeed killed more, factually. It is not a point regarding who's right and wrong, and I think you missed that. But it comes up a lot. And there are people that answer "Hamas".
I'm not making a point about the conflict; I'm making a point about how people choose who (if any) to support.
Question is, did you misunderstand me, or do you fundamentally disagree with me somewhere.