mleku on Nostr: i can't believe you don't get it the URL format is fine, good but the semantics of ...
i can't believe you don't get it
the URL format is fine, good
but the semantics of user@example.com is entirely dependent on the protocol, and it's two pieces, the router, and the server
how does the username relate to the nip-05 json and the - optionally - npub (the name is unique anyway) just define a mapping, and nobody screws it up
if you are gonna leave that thing open you are inviting trouble
but idk what to say
i ported a C implementation of the hamming code and i had a lot of trouble imputing the ACTUAL type that was being used by the compiler so that my code produced the same result, in Go, you don't implicit type casting, it has to be explicit
this is exactly the same kind of mental model issue you are demonstrating, typical C programmer, you have some mapping in your mind, but you won't say it
if you don't, have fun supporting irritated devs using more strict typed languages, you thought this evening was fun, hahaha i'm done, gonna sign off on this
the URL format is fine, good
but the semantics of user@example.com is entirely dependent on the protocol, and it's two pieces, the router, and the server
how does the username relate to the nip-05 json and the - optionally - npub (the name is unique anyway) just define a mapping, and nobody screws it up
if you are gonna leave that thing open you are inviting trouble
but idk what to say
i ported a C implementation of the hamming code and i had a lot of trouble imputing the ACTUAL type that was being used by the compiler so that my code produced the same result, in Go, you don't implicit type casting, it has to be explicit
this is exactly the same kind of mental model issue you are demonstrating, typical C programmer, you have some mapping in your mind, but you won't say it
if you don't, have fun supporting irritated devs using more strict typed languages, you thought this evening was fun, hahaha i'm done, gonna sign off on this