Karl Auerbach on Nostr: In the recent SCOTUS case "Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo" SCOTUS pulled back ...
In the recent SCOTUS case "Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo" SCOTUS pulled back on the discretion of administrative executive branch agencies to make decisions and, instead, pushed that discretion back to Congress.
Now, here comes FFOTUS/Musk and they go in directly the opposite direction. FFOTUS/Musk assert that they have so much administrative power that they can overturn the express statutory frameworks established by Congress.
In other words, SCOTUS had revoked the Chevron doctrine that gave considerable power to administrative agencies. Yet, FFOTUS is following a kind of super-dooper Chevron doctrine that vests total authority in the agencies, even to the extent of determining whether an agency should exist or not.
It has been said that consistency is the hob-goblin of small minds. If that is true than the maga mind is so small that it may be hard to find with a microscope.
Now, here comes FFOTUS/Musk and they go in directly the opposite direction. FFOTUS/Musk assert that they have so much administrative power that they can overturn the express statutory frameworks established by Congress.
In other words, SCOTUS had revoked the Chevron doctrine that gave considerable power to administrative agencies. Yet, FFOTUS is following a kind of super-dooper Chevron doctrine that vests total authority in the agencies, even to the extent of determining whether an agency should exist or not.
It has been said that consistency is the hob-goblin of small minds. If that is true than the maga mind is so small that it may be hard to find with a microscope.