SatoshiConsult on Nostr: It’s confirmed that the new Jade Plus doesn’t have a secure element protecting ...
It’s confirmed that the new Jade Plus doesn’t have a secure element protecting the private key.
SatoshiConsult (npub1rzn…r4ly) always expected the next signing device from Blockstream (npub1jg5…6n8n) to have at least one secure element, and not only a virtual secure element.
That’s really surprising for a signing device where the price starts at $149.
Why does Blockstream (npub1jg5…6n8n) still prioritize a blind oracle over a secure element for protecting the private key?
SatoshiConsult (npub1rzn…r4ly) always expected the next signing device from Blockstream (npub1jg5…6n8n) to have at least one secure element, and not only a virtual secure element.
That’s really surprising for a signing device where the price starts at $149.
Why does Blockstream (npub1jg5…6n8n) still prioritize a blind oracle over a secure element for protecting the private key?