Tamas Blummer [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2018-05-28 📝 Original message:Forgot to mention: The ...
📅 Original date posted:2018-05-28
📝 Original message:Forgot to mention: The link I sent is to a branch that is patched to produce the filter stats.
This is the main project and the BIP158 implementation: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin-spv/blob/master/src/blockfilter.rs
Tamas Blummer
> On May 28, 2018, at 20:18, Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> A “basic” combined filter would mean up to 0.5 GB filter data per month (with 100% segwith use). Considering that 1 GB is the usual data quota for an entry level mobile phone contract, this could be a too high barrier for adoption.
>
> I repeated your calculations and produced a slightly different graph that shows the fraction of cummulative filter size to cummulative blockchain size. This is less noisy but otherwise confirms your measurement.
>
> I think that the data supports separation of filters as a combined filter does not seem to come with significant savings. (basic size ~= txid + input points + output scripts sizes)
>
> My calculations are repeatable with:
>
> https://github.com/tamasblummer/rust-bitcoin-spv/blob/blockfilterstats/src/bin/blockfilterstats.rs
>
> that is using a Rust implementation of an SPV client built on top of other libraries we work on in the rust-bitcoin GitHub community (https://github.com/rust-bitcoin). Yes, this is a shameles plug for the project hoping to attract more developer.
>
> Tamas Blummer
>
>
> <filters.png>
>
>> On May 24, 2018, at 05:48, Jim Posen via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Greg, I've attached a graph including the input scripts.
>>
>> In the top graph, we can see how the input script filter compares to the input outpoint filter. It is definitely smaller as a result of address reuse. The bottom graph shows the ratio over time of combining the input prev script and output script filters vs keeping them separate. In more recent blocks, it appears that there are decreasing savings.
>>
>
📝 Original message:Forgot to mention: The link I sent is to a branch that is patched to produce the filter stats.
This is the main project and the BIP158 implementation: https://github.com/rust-bitcoin/rust-bitcoin-spv/blob/master/src/blockfilter.rs
Tamas Blummer
> On May 28, 2018, at 20:18, Tamas Blummer <tamas.blummer at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> A “basic” combined filter would mean up to 0.5 GB filter data per month (with 100% segwith use). Considering that 1 GB is the usual data quota for an entry level mobile phone contract, this could be a too high barrier for adoption.
>
> I repeated your calculations and produced a slightly different graph that shows the fraction of cummulative filter size to cummulative blockchain size. This is less noisy but otherwise confirms your measurement.
>
> I think that the data supports separation of filters as a combined filter does not seem to come with significant savings. (basic size ~= txid + input points + output scripts sizes)
>
> My calculations are repeatable with:
>
> https://github.com/tamasblummer/rust-bitcoin-spv/blob/blockfilterstats/src/bin/blockfilterstats.rs
>
> that is using a Rust implementation of an SPV client built on top of other libraries we work on in the rust-bitcoin GitHub community (https://github.com/rust-bitcoin). Yes, this is a shameles plug for the project hoping to attract more developer.
>
> Tamas Blummer
>
>
> <filters.png>
>
>> On May 24, 2018, at 05:48, Jim Posen via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev at lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> Greg, I've attached a graph including the input scripts.
>>
>> In the top graph, we can see how the input script filter compares to the input outpoint filter. It is definitely smaller as a result of address reuse. The bottom graph shows the ratio over time of combining the input prev script and output script filters vs keeping them separate. In more recent blocks, it appears that there are decreasing savings.
>>
>