Ryan Grant [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2021-06-12 📝 Original message: Apologies, I found the ...

📅 Original date posted:2021-06-12
📝 Original message:
Apologies, I found the discussion going on here:
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/943

On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 7:52 PM Ryan Grant <bitcoin-dev at rgrant.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have detected some definite confusion among people who are not aware
> of the most recent updates to the bip118 draft. I don't know if
> that's common among readers of these lists.
>
> Substantial edits to the bip118 draft were made through May 2019,
> including changing its official name to SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT. The
> internal heading "Revisions" discusses these changes.
>
> https://github.com/ajtowns/bips/blob/c7c6a58b7a66a5dc5f4435319577d26a34082a79/bip-0118.mediawiki#Revisions
> https://github.com/ajtowns/bips/compare/master...ajtowns:bip-anyprevout
> https://github.com/ajtowns/bips/blob/c7c6a58b7a66a5dc5f4435319577d26a34082a79/bip-0118.mediawiki
>
> The version in bitcoin/bips was not modified since 2018, until it
> diverged by collecting a minor fix two months ago. It still uses
> SIGHASH_NOINPUT terminology.
>
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0118.mediawiki
>
> AFAICT, with taproot activating, the preferred method to ease
> lightning network client state requirements will now definitely be
> SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT.
>
> I am not aware of reasons for bip118's updated draft to sit on the
> sidelines before consideration by a wider audience.