mrdragon on Nostr: He presents a very different point of view. And that's coming from having a "lense" ...
He presents a very different point of view. And that's coming from having a "lense" of a soldier.
If what he says is true (and it probably is, I just don't have enough knowledge about war) - then Bitcoin shouldn't be even discussed with the SEC or whoever is responsible for the monetary system.
It has to be discussed at the security/defense level.
As he said, that would completely overcome all the resistance to adopting BTC and it would be adopted in a completely different way than we, regular plebs, thought it would be.
Saylor also has a similar point of view and he also served in the army. These guys understand something more than us regular plebs don't.
If what he says is true (and it probably is, I just don't have enough knowledge about war) - then Bitcoin shouldn't be even discussed with the SEC or whoever is responsible for the monetary system.
It has to be discussed at the security/defense level.
As he said, that would completely overcome all the resistance to adopting BTC and it would be adopted in a completely different way than we, regular plebs, thought it would be.
Saylor also has a similar point of view and he also served in the army. These guys understand something more than us regular plebs don't.