tolot on Nostr: I agree on the fact that he *seems* to be ignorant about his ignorance, even though I ...

I agree on the fact that he *seems* to be ignorant about his ignorance, even though I don't really think he is. My perception is that he eccessively tries to reduce what the counterparty said to a domain he is more knowledgeable about. With Tech stuff that is usually somehow fine, because he is a machine learning engineer...quite frankly he knows a lot about that spectrum of tech. When talking about other matters he probably has to work a bit more on the "investigative side" rather than the "conclusion" side.

Overall I find him a good podcaster: first of all he is NOT very opinionated, which means that he has the opportunity to let the truth emerge rather than simply fancying some theories of one or the other side. He goes in deep in the background, writings, experience of the other person, he does his homeworks and tries to connect the dots. This is not something I find usually in most of the other shows.