Professor_Stevens on Nostr: nprofile1q…m32kp Nice comparison, but it kind of overlooks its own point: there are ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq9lt4284mghqxekzm6n5njxurnxrxhqhrva2leusdsuu5ja5jeycqxm32kp (nprofile…32kp)
Nice comparison, but it kind of overlooks its own point: there are always some people ready to believe what they want to believe. So, people who want to believe in psychics take what might be proof and accept it as proof itself. Same with LLM evangelists. Here, Bjarnason wants there to be a parallel, draws some diagrams that might prove there is one, and says that is proof.
In fact, all three are just examples of confirmation bias.
Nice comparison, but it kind of overlooks its own point: there are always some people ready to believe what they want to believe. So, people who want to believe in psychics take what might be proof and accept it as proof itself. Same with LLM evangelists. Here, Bjarnason wants there to be a parallel, draws some diagrams that might prove there is one, and says that is proof.
In fact, all three are just examples of confirmation bias.