Chris [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2015-11-30 📝 Original message:On 11/16/2015 07:42 PM, ...
📅 Original date posted:2015-11-30
📝 Original message:On 11/16/2015 07:42 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Sequence is used for opting in as it is the only "free-form" field
> available for that purpose. Opt-in per output was proposed as well by
> Luke-Jr, however the CTxOut data structure simply doesn't contain any
> extra fields to use for that purpose.
What is wrong with using they same scheme as sighash_single?
If input 0 has nSequence < maxint-1 then output 0 is replaceable.
For fee bumps you would just stick the change in position zero and
reduce the value.
You get FFS functionality without the hassle of addition other inputs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151129/dc16d383/attachment.html>
📝 Original message:On 11/16/2015 07:42 PM, Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Sequence is used for opting in as it is the only "free-form" field
> available for that purpose. Opt-in per output was proposed as well by
> Luke-Jr, however the CTxOut data structure simply doesn't contain any
> extra fields to use for that purpose.
What is wrong with using they same scheme as sighash_single?
If input 0 has nSequence < maxint-1 then output 0 is replaceable.
For fee bumps you would just stick the change in position zero and
reduce the value.
You get FFS functionality without the hassle of addition other inputs.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20151129/dc16d383/attachment.html>