nostr_is_not_web3 on Nostr: #[0]

quoting nevent1q…cm29

jb55 一直在探索我早先对nostr感到最激动的可能性。我觉得这是nostr上最被低估的特性，也是我后面想花最多精力探索的一个地方（可惜我现在被一堆flycat 体验上的活拖着）这个想法是把代码直接存到 relay 上，代码的作者可验证（有哈希有签名，解决分发代码的信任问题）、note的数据格式统一，只要客户端再配合上相同的runtime，就可以运行代码了。看着好像是非常简单的一个idea，但这不比 EVM 智能合约 web3 之流强上一百倍？我们要想想所谓的 web3、smart contract 到底要解决什么问题？就大部分场景（尤其是 web3/社交等等），一个nostr这样的信任保证和relay机制才是正确的选择。而不是p2p/blockchain。 jb55 has been exploring the potential that initially excited me the most about Nostr. I believe it is the most underestimated feature of Nostr and the area where I want to dedicate the most effort in my exploration going forward (unfortunately, I'm currently being occupied with a bunch of activities related to Flycat experiences). The idea is to directly store code on Relay, with the code author being verifiable (using hashes and signatures to address code distribution trust issues), and the note data format being standardized. As long as the client is equipped with the same runtime, the code can be executed. This idea seems to be a very simple one, but isn't it a hundred times more powerful than concepts like EVM, smart contracts, and web3? We need to carefully consider what problems web3 and smart contracts are truly meant to solve. In most scenarios, especially web3/social contexts, a trust guarantee and relay mechanism like Nostr is the right choice, rather than relying on p2p/blockchain.