Gary Rowe [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-12-05 📝 Original message:Personally, I would be ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-12-05
📝 Original message:Personally, I would be more inclined to submit and work on a BIP if it was
in GitHub. It's a regular home from home for me now.
On 5 December 2013 14:43, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
> This entire discussion is recycled. Please review the previous
> discussion, before asking the same questions over again.
>
> Properly done, there are FEWER hurdles. In the previous discussion,
> there was outlined a process whereby the BIPS Editor would receive an
> email, and could take it from there. No wiki login or bitcoin payment
> required. More advanced users may submit pull requests.
>
> Compared with a hash-sealed git repo as primary source, the wiki is
> second class.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:37:10 PM Wladimir wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> A while ago after discussion on the mailing list a repository was set
> up to
> >> store the BIP documents, as this is deemed a more secure solution than
> >> having them on the wiki:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
> >>
> >> To prevent confusion the next step should probably be to replace the
> BIPs
> >> on the wiki with links to the github documents, with a notice that
> changes
> >> should be proposed on github or mailed to the BIP editor (gmaxwell).
> >>
> >> Agreed?
> >
> > I think this would stifle active BIP draft editing. We're already having
> a
> > hard time getting some developers to write BIPs for their proposals - I
> don't
> > think we should be putting up bigger hurdles.
> >
> > Luke
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> > Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> > Download it for free now!
> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bitcoin-development mailing list
> > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131205/a4e50d00/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:Personally, I would be more inclined to submit and work on a BIP if it was
in GitHub. It's a regular home from home for me now.
On 5 December 2013 14:43, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik at bitpay.com> wrote:
> This entire discussion is recycled. Please review the previous
> discussion, before asking the same questions over again.
>
> Properly done, there are FEWER hurdles. In the previous discussion,
> there was outlined a process whereby the BIPS Editor would receive an
> email, and could take it from there. No wiki login or bitcoin payment
> required. More advanced users may submit pull requests.
>
> Compared with a hash-sealed git repo as primary source, the wiki is
> second class.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Luke-Jr <luke at dashjr.org> wrote:
> > On Thursday, December 05, 2013 1:37:10 PM Wladimir wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >>
> >> A while ago after discussion on the mailing list a repository was set
> up to
> >> store the BIP documents, as this is deemed a more secure solution than
> >> having them on the wiki:
> >>
> >> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips
> >>
> >> To prevent confusion the next step should probably be to replace the
> BIPs
> >> on the wiki with links to the github documents, with a notice that
> changes
> >> should be proposed on github or mailed to the BIP editor (gmaxwell).
> >>
> >> Agreed?
> >
> > I think this would stifle active BIP draft editing. We're already having
> a
> > hard time getting some developers to write BIPs for their proposals - I
> don't
> > think we should be putting up bigger hurdles.
> >
> > Luke
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> > Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> > Download it for free now!
> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bitcoin-development mailing list
> > Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Garzik
> Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
> BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
> Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps with a single code base.
> Download it for free now!
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=111408631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131205/a4e50d00/attachment.html>;