Mike on Nostr: You just said you didn't believe me, you then argued a timeline which I didn't ...
You just said you didn't believe me, you then argued a timeline which I didn't discuss and doesn't disprove my statement.
My understanding of the Geneva convention on the use of TL;DR in discussions is that moot points and false fallacies become illegal to use once declared 😂
I'm going to combine Adam Back's stance with Roger Ver, along with Satoshi's approach:
"If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."
I have the time, but I did this professionally for 8 years, where the outcome mattered, so I don't have the inclination to do this now, for no return.
Happy to discuss Bitcoin, but I'll leave the energy discussions in my history books.
My understanding of the Geneva convention on the use of TL;DR in discussions is that moot points and false fallacies become illegal to use once declared 😂
I'm going to combine Adam Back's stance with Roger Ver, along with Satoshi's approach:
"If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."
I have the time, but I did this professionally for 8 years, where the outcome mattered, so I don't have the inclination to do this now, for no return.
Happy to discuss Bitcoin, but I'll leave the energy discussions in my history books.