ð“…“ owl. on Nostr: Weird how upon reading the widely posted and generally accepted definition of the ...
Weird how upon reading the widely posted and generally accepted definition of the word "pornsick," it only references a connotation of being bad for women and becoming a sadist, but nothing about how pornography *actually* sickens people other than how it hurts women.
It speaks about how it conditions men to be abusive toward women, and for women to be conditioned into receiving abuse from men. So we have an interestingly potent word that in theory would describe a lot of people damaged by pornography to the point that it affects their every interaction, socially and politically disenfranchises them, but instead the establishment just went "well how can we make this about victimized women."
It's sad because what I *thought* the word meant, only ended up meaning something else entirely stupid.​
It speaks about how it conditions men to be abusive toward women, and for women to be conditioned into receiving abuse from men. So we have an interestingly potent word that in theory would describe a lot of people damaged by pornography to the point that it affects their every interaction, socially and politically disenfranchises them, but instead the establishment just went "well how can we make this about victimized women."
It's sad because what I *thought* the word meant, only ended up meaning something else entirely stupid.​