npub1zl…22n8p on Nostr: A constant dog whistle, consistently used in social discourse, represents a repeated ...

A constant dog whistle, consistently used in social discourse, represents a repeated use of coded language that is intended for a particular audience, yet remains somewhat veiled to broader listeners. While these signals can initially rally supporters by referencing shared anxieties, values, or grievances, they progressively lose potency if employed incessantly. Just as the child who cried wolf repeatedly found that his warnings fell on deaf ears over time, a constant reliance on unfulfilled insinuations or hyperbolic threats undermines credibility. Audiences become jaded, questioning whether these alarming hints ever truly materialise into authentic danger or legitimate concern. As their suspicion grows, believers and potential allies alike grow weary of rhetoric that persistently hints at imminent catastrophe but rarely provides tangible evidence. This erosion of trust compromises the original intention behind the coded appeals, making them appear manipulative or disingenuous. Furthermore, when the explicit menace implied by such messages repeatedly fails to materialise, even otherwise receptive followers begin to doubt the sincerity and significance of the warnings. The persistent use of dog whistles reaches a point at which the coded cues merely ring hollow. Instead of energising a base or swaying undecided observers, they risk provoking scepticism, ridicule, or outright dismissal. In the long run, the outcome mirrors the fable’s lesson: constantly sounding alarms without basis yields diminishing returns.