whygetfat on Nostr: Aaron Siri: "You might say, well, the MMR has been carefully reviewed and studied. ...
Aaron Siri: "You might say, well, the MMR has been carefully reviewed and studied. Has it? Really? […] We'll just take a super-quick peek. Here's the clinical trial relied upon to license the MMR vaccine. 834 children (not properly powered), no control, 42 days of safety review. And by the way, a third had gastrointestinal issues and a third had respiratory issues in the trial. […]
"Here's the vaccine information sheet for measles, mumps and rubella. It includes disclosures such as seizures, deafness, long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness and brain damage. But they got rid of that now, because you know, uh, heh, so anyway. . . […] These are all of the conditions that are disclosed that the manufacturers say can be caused very serious conditions, separate from the cancer stuff, separate from the heart disease stuff. These are the ones they have a causal basis to include. […]
"There was only one MMR vaccine for forever by Merck, with that clinical trial I just showed you, which was underpowered, no control and not enough safety review.
"Well, GlaxoSmithKline finally, they went and they licensed an MMR vaccine. What did they use as a control in the study? They used the Merck vaccine! So we finally could see what is the Adverse Event Rate amongst the healthy childhood population of getting these products!
"Buried in a supplemental table, not in the primary study, it's right here. So you could see that Serious Adverse Events amongst those getting MMR-RIT and MMR-II (so MMR-RIT is the GSK version, MMR II is the Merck version). Around 2% had a Serious Adverse Event.
"But here's an interesting thing. By the way I've never seen this before. They took [added two categories], 'Adverse Events prompting an ER visit' and 'NOCDs.' This is a new thing [category], 'New Onset Chronic Disease.' They removed those from Serious Adverse Events. I don't know why [chuckles].
"So you got to look at all three of them and add them up, cumulatively. Okay? So you've got 2% with the Serious Adverse Event. We looked at what those are earlier. Those are serious. You have another 10% that needed an ER visit prompted from the vaccine. And you had another about 3.4% that had a New Onset Chronic Disease during the review period for the vaccine, which was unsolicited, 42 days, and then AEs were done for 180 days.
"To me, that should be really concerning. If every few months, every child, 3.4% of children in America had a chronic disease that arose, every person in America would have a chronic disease, over a long enough period of time.
"Anyways, I'm not looking to cast aspersions on the MMR vaccine. I'm really just pointing out that in the same way that the federal health authorities do not have any issue, in my opinion, giving an impression of what these products can do, how harmful they were before there was a vaccine, and misleading the public with regards to MMR vaccine, I don't think they have an issue misleading the public regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. I think it's kind of the same type of approach.
"I should say, for what it's worth, I think most public health authorities and medical professionals are well meaning. I think that they really, they believe that they are, um, you know, they don't know. They just they have assumptions about these products. They're well-meaning. They think that they are. . . they really need to, no matter what, get you to take it, because that's going to save everybody.
"But when you step back and you're not emotional or religious about these products and you just look at the data, they paint a very different picture. And it's unfortunate that we can't have those kind of objective discussions."
Aaron Siri @ 54:30–58:41 https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/siri-testifies-new-hampshire-the-transmission-paradox/
"Here's the vaccine information sheet for measles, mumps and rubella. It includes disclosures such as seizures, deafness, long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness and brain damage. But they got rid of that now, because you know, uh, heh, so anyway. . . […] These are all of the conditions that are disclosed that the manufacturers say can be caused very serious conditions, separate from the cancer stuff, separate from the heart disease stuff. These are the ones they have a causal basis to include. […]
"There was only one MMR vaccine for forever by Merck, with that clinical trial I just showed you, which was underpowered, no control and not enough safety review.
"Well, GlaxoSmithKline finally, they went and they licensed an MMR vaccine. What did they use as a control in the study? They used the Merck vaccine! So we finally could see what is the Adverse Event Rate amongst the healthy childhood population of getting these products!
"Buried in a supplemental table, not in the primary study, it's right here. So you could see that Serious Adverse Events amongst those getting MMR-RIT and MMR-II (so MMR-RIT is the GSK version, MMR II is the Merck version). Around 2% had a Serious Adverse Event.
"But here's an interesting thing. By the way I've never seen this before. They took [added two categories], 'Adverse Events prompting an ER visit' and 'NOCDs.' This is a new thing [category], 'New Onset Chronic Disease.' They removed those from Serious Adverse Events. I don't know why [chuckles].
"So you got to look at all three of them and add them up, cumulatively. Okay? So you've got 2% with the Serious Adverse Event. We looked at what those are earlier. Those are serious. You have another 10% that needed an ER visit prompted from the vaccine. And you had another about 3.4% that had a New Onset Chronic Disease during the review period for the vaccine, which was unsolicited, 42 days, and then AEs were done for 180 days.
"To me, that should be really concerning. If every few months, every child, 3.4% of children in America had a chronic disease that arose, every person in America would have a chronic disease, over a long enough period of time.
"Anyways, I'm not looking to cast aspersions on the MMR vaccine. I'm really just pointing out that in the same way that the federal health authorities do not have any issue, in my opinion, giving an impression of what these products can do, how harmful they were before there was a vaccine, and misleading the public with regards to MMR vaccine, I don't think they have an issue misleading the public regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. I think it's kind of the same type of approach.
"I should say, for what it's worth, I think most public health authorities and medical professionals are well meaning. I think that they really, they believe that they are, um, you know, they don't know. They just they have assumptions about these products. They're well-meaning. They think that they are. . . they really need to, no matter what, get you to take it, because that's going to save everybody.
"But when you step back and you're not emotional or religious about these products and you just look at the data, they paint a very different picture. And it's unfortunate that we can't have those kind of objective discussions."
Aaron Siri @ 54:30–58:41 https://thehighwire.com/ark-videos/siri-testifies-new-hampshire-the-transmission-paradox/