Mike Hearn [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: 📅 Original date posted:2013-10-24 📝 Original message:On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at ...
📅 Original date posted:2013-10-24
📝 Original message:On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Quick thought on how to make blockchain-based fee estimates work better
> in the context of out-of-band mining contracts: have miners advertise in
> their coinbase's what fees were actually paid, as opposed to appear to
> have been paid.
This is interesting, but I suppose some miners may have business models
that can't be easily summed up as a "fee" - like all-you-can-eat deals with
certain providers, or preference to certain kinds of transactions etc.
For the concern that estimation might force fees down too far if miners
include private transactions, I thought the estimates were calculated only
on broadcast transactions, so transactions that just appear in a block
won't ever influence the estimate?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131024/76944c85/attachment.html>;
📝 Original message:On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Peter Todd <pete at petertodd.org> wrote:
> Quick thought on how to make blockchain-based fee estimates work better
> in the context of out-of-band mining contracts: have miners advertise in
> their coinbase's what fees were actually paid, as opposed to appear to
> have been paid.
This is interesting, but I suppose some miners may have business models
that can't be easily summed up as a "fee" - like all-you-can-eat deals with
certain providers, or preference to certain kinds of transactions etc.
For the concern that estimation might force fees down too far if miners
include private transactions, I thought the estimates were calculated only
on broadcast transactions, so transactions that just appear in a block
won't ever influence the estimate?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20131024/76944c85/attachment.html>;