CodePsychology on Nostr: Also this what to allow, what not to allow is an interesting question in my opinion. ...
Also this what to allow, what not to allow is an interesting question in my opinion.
You could argue, that in bad situations, it does not help if people increase unrest, FUD, etc.
BUT if a profit centric company sets these rules, and decides what you can see, it also poses the problem, that showing drugs for a drug addict is the most profitable to do...
And if you optimize AI to do content optimization, it is inevitable to converge to... I mean if only profit optimization is the goal.
So basically we build a system to "prevent people from such bad consequences", to at the end cause the same bad consequence on an other topic while we make a company rich. Does it make sense?
You could argue, that in bad situations, it does not help if people increase unrest, FUD, etc.
BUT if a profit centric company sets these rules, and decides what you can see, it also poses the problem, that showing drugs for a drug addict is the most profitable to do...
And if you optimize AI to do content optimization, it is inevitable to converge to... I mean if only profit optimization is the goal.
So basically we build a system to "prevent people from such bad consequences", to at the end cause the same bad consequence on an other topic while we make a company rich. Does it make sense?
quoting nevent1q…597sSo interesting to me that YT allows WW3 titled videos.
Is it because at the moment:
Engagement farming >> decreasing social unrest?
I mean compared to other type of contents...
Also funny for me, not funny but nah, that Instagram deletes sexual education profiles, but allows people "putting their things out". Double standards...
Open-source free world for the win!