Ruth Mottram on Nostr: nprofile1q…m9rcf nprofile1q…3xxkw nprofile1q…e4kmp I don't disagree that the ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq5w0zuueq6swfmzuddf2qt5ldsmn22nala5l6gp295yaa84jyp5mqem9rcf (nprofile…9rcf) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqcsmecp6896u23nk3vcw4zywlctdq36wzq0a0znhrp6ult5l5ns0sf3xxkw (nprofile…xxkw) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpq9ly5nycz3gdcehlrtkhp6g75vlg65209ytzzansyhsqdpnzmcpyqke4kmp (nprofile…4kmp)
I don't disagree that the public facing uses of so called AI are mostly annoying and/or disappointing, but the field as a whole is gigantic, and we're already seeing big use cases in e.g. weather/climate research. The training data is the killer as usual so careful application will be important. I'd rathe rhave AI development under a decent regulatory regime than the wild west.
I don't disagree that the public facing uses of so called AI are mostly annoying and/or disappointing, but the field as a whole is gigantic, and we're already seeing big use cases in e.g. weather/climate research. The training data is the killer as usual so careful application will be important. I'd rathe rhave AI development under a decent regulatory regime than the wild west.