Charly C. on Nostr: npub172v3n…u689n I'm not at all convinced that this is going in a good direction. I ...

npub172v3nlrtzd8wssn8f3ckm47jtsxdhq0jakqua3crgrvn7mmv32vsju689n (npub172v…689n) I'm not at all convinced that this is going in a good direction. I think ideally there should be only one flexible yet simple syntax to create all kinds of structures. In other words, I'd be interested in a new syntax to fully replace the `class` keyword, which would make `dataclasses` and `namedtuple` and other similar things obsolete.

That said, I also think that the Python language almost certainly has too much history and inertia to be fully fixed, so a new language is needed.