Event JSON
{
"id": "42b10fe2018628163bbf6dfcd41c705a9e6c2f0fe5c469687b82b38cb55fd31f",
"pubkey": "6fe1148f4fb15594ca253beebbdaf26a300b10f2eb8282af00dd98dd1dabf3f3",
"created_at": 1688750942,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"d2856f8c03ccf179e0945341286a19ebfbc81818194d7df6b7450c2fb02a50be",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"p",
"b7c0111790dd12231f368b4ad3ea8fa87d41f34efd42219f14815701e5d4a16f",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub"
],
[
"e",
"eb52c3a07c3a83d88db650189b3e179e4b1182e00977ed84dfca1f78378a7631",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"mostr",
"https://mastodon.social/users/sundogplanets/statuses/110673981738778788"
]
],
"content": "nostr:npub162zklrqrenchncy52dqjs6sea0ausxqcr9xhma4hg5xzlvp22zlq35a839 Without reading the paper, and without knowing much about galaxies....is that actually statistically significant? Could there be an observational bias that causes that? If it's real, would that be from formation mechanisms or suggesting the whole universe is spinning?? This is bonkers to think about...",
"sig": "49a8d332b2a8236b1853b42e7af8677004efe082bb1730ff90d92ab24bf107fe5315fd7c5eb95306bb23fbad0f142ed67f6c45c73a72c8c8152d047be897fed7"
}
