see shy jo on Nostr: recently read a blog post that was arguing against using git commit -m and suggested ...
recently read a blog post that was arguing against using git commit -m and suggested that it might be worth learning the basics of nano or something in order to edit the commit message that way
Kind of flabbergasting, but is there a culture of only using -m in that is resulting in entirely oneline commit messages? See also commit messages that look like "feat: adding new feature to optimize apps" and "chore: add CI"
Kind of flabbergasting, but is there a culture of only using -m in that is resulting in entirely oneline commit messages? See also commit messages that look like "feat: adding new feature to optimize apps" and "chore: add CI"