mcc on Nostr: Due to the extremely large number of basic functions "systemd" has usurped from other ...
Due to the extremely large number of basic functions "systemd" has usurped from other parts of the OS, a natural and interesting project would be to see if systemd can now exist independently apart from Linux, or rather, to ascertain what is the most minimal alternate kernel that could serve as a life support system for successfully running systemd. Since calling this "System System" would be absurd, the most logical name for such a project would be "d OS", or "DOS". In this Mastodon post I will
Published at
2023-12-26 19:38:59Event JSON
{
"id": "43f3f3edd95bfc20a479919198f35f633a6e925ec178ff54fb381f9e36b232d7",
"pubkey": "a3162b9720f6b515ac4bd22d5ea4abf0f85f5685130dca40f46fe684fe85b255",
"created_at": 1703619539,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.social/users/mcc/statuses/111648410153319617",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Due to the extremely large number of basic functions \"systemd\" has usurped from other parts of the OS, a natural and interesting project would be to see if systemd can now exist independently apart from Linux, or rather, to ascertain what is the most minimal alternate kernel that could serve as a life support system for successfully running systemd. Since calling this \"System System\" would be absurd, the most logical name for such a project would be \"d OS\", or \"DOS\". In this Mastodon post I will",
"sig": "d975e8d01239c7878c3641dc3cb5e8f48436c28aaba1557333fb1cfc8c9d3aa13ac52bed2a0a574d7058c187fb6cfbbabf8e953ce004f6a49a6c43c61a4690ee"
}
