franzap on Nostr: Haha it does remind of that xkcd 😄 Re: trustroots, that's very cool. A friend and ...
Haha it does remind of that xkcd 😄
Re: trustroots, that's very cool. A friend and I were also planning to eventually bring it back, clearly using WoT
Fully agree with first paragraph. I just read NIP-77 and have some feedback and questions:
- I don't agree that "trust is transitive", why do you say this? It definitely scales down in an exponential way, anything beyond 3 hops is basically useless
- I think very few relays will end up supporting the REQ change, better go the DVM route as hodlbod said (plus with enough data these computations will become cpu intensive)
- Definitely like the '*', makes it easy to bootstrap
I know this was brought up earlier, but what kind of UX you think is required to start populating these events with complex data like scores 1-100 + confidence 1-100?
Re: trustroots, that's very cool. A friend and I were also planning to eventually bring it back, clearly using WoT
Fully agree with first paragraph. I just read NIP-77 and have some feedback and questions:
- I don't agree that "trust is transitive", why do you say this? It definitely scales down in an exponential way, anything beyond 3 hops is basically useless
- I think very few relays will end up supporting the REQ change, better go the DVM route as hodlbod said (plus with enough data these computations will become cpu intensive)
- Definitely like the '*', makes it easy to bootstrap
I know this was brought up earlier, but what kind of UX you think is required to start populating these events with complex data like scores 1-100 + confidence 1-100?