📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08 📝 Original message:I like the bitcoin days ...

Gavin Andresen [ARCHIVE] /

npub1s4l…44kw

2023-06-07 15:33:56

in reply to nevent1q…at49

📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08
📝 Original message:I like the bitcoin days destroyed idea.

I like lots of the ideas that have been presented here, on the bitcointalk
forums, etc etc etc.

It is easy to make a proposal, it is hard to wade through all of the
proposals. I'm going to balance that equation by completely ignoring any
proposal that isn't accompanied by code that implements the proposal (with
appropriate tests).

However, I'm not the bottleneck-- you need to get the attention of the
other committers and convince THEM:

a) something should be done "now-ish"
b) your idea is good

We are stuck on (a) right now, I think.

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen <
joel.kaartinen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Matt,
>
> It seems you missed my suggestion about basing the maximum block size on
> the bitcoin days destroyed in transactions that are included in the block.
> I think it has potential for both scaling as well as keeping up a constant
> fee pressure. If tuned properly, it should both stop spamming and increase
> block size maximum when there are a lot of real transactions waiting for
> inclusion.
>
> - Joel
>

--
--
Gavin Andresen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150508/f3bd5434/attachment.html>;

Author Public Key

npub1s4lj77xuzcu7wy04afcr487f0r3za0f8n2775xrpkld2sv639mjqsd44kw

Show more details

Published at

2023-06-07 15:33:56

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "4f138087ce3eadfd64e88a3208a506fd107eaad3bfecd2a49693001f8b755749", "pubkey": "857f2f78dc1639e711f5ea703a9fc978e22ebd279abdea1861b7daa833512ee4", "created_at": 1686152036, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "e", "aec396df7693e37c124fbd2891fe6c4a3b28f46e7fbc3f304a7b1d78d2f5ffbe", "", "root" ], [ "e", "55ac02cbd16c85ab03922fb367784115a4581fa7a5eb69820e8d31551c26d1ab", "", "reply" ], [ "p", "f00d0858b09287e941ccbc491567cc70bdbc62d714628b167c1b76e7fef04d91" ] ], "content": "📅 Original date posted:2015-05-08\n📝 Original message:I like the bitcoin days destroyed idea.\n\nI like lots of the ideas that have been presented here, on the bitcointalk\nforums, etc etc etc.\n\nIt is easy to make a proposal, it is hard to wade through all of the\nproposals. I'm going to balance that equation by completely ignoring any\nproposal that isn't accompanied by code that implements the proposal (with\nappropriate tests).\n\nHowever, I'm not the bottleneck-- you need to get the attention of the\nother committers and convince THEM:\n\na) something should be done \"now-ish\"\nb) your idea is good\n\nWe are stuck on (a) right now, I think.\n\n\nOn Fri, May 8, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Joel Joonatan Kaartinen \u003c\njoel.kaartinen at gmail.com\u003e wrote:\n\n\u003e Matt,\n\u003e\n\u003e It seems you missed my suggestion about basing the maximum block size on\n\u003e the bitcoin days destroyed in transactions that are included in the block.\n\u003e I think it has potential for both scaling as well as keeping up a constant\n\u003e fee pressure. If tuned properly, it should both stop spamming and increase\n\u003e block size maximum when there are a lot of real transactions waiting for\n\u003e inclusion.\n\u003e\n\u003e - Joel\n\u003e\n\n\n-- \n--\nGavin Andresen\n-------------- next part --------------\nAn HTML attachment was scrubbed...\nURL: \u003chttp://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20150508/f3bd5434/attachment.html\u003e", "sig": "3d0212438d8207ffc458d26d52c95450c9de04a8b49788155518dcdc36568a8a50fb6a40fdbd1c404d69ccc6e7f114b9660cf46bae8eebe4b875ffa2ba3843a7" }