Decentralize_everything on Nostr: For two centuries, economics and ethics (political philosophy) had diverged from ...
For two centuries, economics and ethics (political philosophy) had
diverged from their common origin in natural law doctrine into seem-
ingly unrelated intellectual endeavors. Economics was a value-free “posi-
tive” science. It asked, “What means are appropriate to bring about a given
(assumed) end?” Ethics was a “normative” science (if it was a science at all).
It asked, “What ends (and what use of means) is one justifi ed to choose?” As
a result of this separation, the concept of property increasingly disappeared
from both disciplines. For economists, property sounded too normative; for
political philosophers property smacked of mundane economics.
In contrast, Rothbard noted, such elementary economic terms as direct
and indirect exchange, markets and market prices, as well as aggression,
crime, tort, and fraud, cannot be defi ned or understood without a theory
of property. Nor is it possible to establish the familiar economic theorems
relating to these phenomena without the implied notion of property and
property rights. A defi nition and theory of property must precede the defi -
nition and establishment of all other economic terms and theorems.
Rothbard’s unique contribution, from the early 1960s until his death in
1995, was the rediscovery of property and property rights as the common
foundation of both economics and political philosophy, and the systematic
reconstruction and conceptual integration of modern, marginalist econom-
ics and natural law political philosophy into a unifi ed moral science: liber-
tarianism.
Hans-Hermann Hoppe, The Great Fiction, 2nd edition, page 21
diverged from their common origin in natural law doctrine into seem-
ingly unrelated intellectual endeavors. Economics was a value-free “posi-
tive” science. It asked, “What means are appropriate to bring about a given
(assumed) end?” Ethics was a “normative” science (if it was a science at all).
It asked, “What ends (and what use of means) is one justifi ed to choose?” As
a result of this separation, the concept of property increasingly disappeared
from both disciplines. For economists, property sounded too normative; for
political philosophers property smacked of mundane economics.
In contrast, Rothbard noted, such elementary economic terms as direct
and indirect exchange, markets and market prices, as well as aggression,
crime, tort, and fraud, cannot be defi ned or understood without a theory
of property. Nor is it possible to establish the familiar economic theorems
relating to these phenomena without the implied notion of property and
property rights. A defi nition and theory of property must precede the defi -
nition and establishment of all other economic terms and theorems.
Rothbard’s unique contribution, from the early 1960s until his death in
1995, was the rediscovery of property and property rights as the common
foundation of both economics and political philosophy, and the systematic
reconstruction and conceptual integration of modern, marginalist econom-
ics and natural law political philosophy into a unifi ed moral science: liber-
tarianism.
Hans-Hermann Hoppe, The Great Fiction, 2nd edition, page 21