π π π π π π π π on Nostr: npub183n8fβ¦wtahh And ironically you just did exactly that by omitting the rest of ...
npub183n8fp0xavfvuejszsfzkf44af77j6xfgmk33k2whm7ktflcr4jqswtahh (npub183nβ¦tahh)
And ironically you just did exactly that by omitting the rest of his quote that was misleading, wrong and blatantly against free software as a whole because Steve Ballmer is a scumbag that wanted to sell malware and free software is the antithesis of that very practice. While doubling down on the negative connotations on copyleft used mostly by OSImp retards and cuck BSD developers.
Things like these is why I mostly ignore youtube Linuxtards like you and Nick, you're full of shit most of the time and all the way into open source corporate propaganda.
Here's the actual full Q/A from that interview.
Q: Do you view Linux and the open-source movement as a threat to Microsoft?
A: Yeah. It's good competition. It will force us to be innovative. It will force us to justify the prices and value that we deliver. And that's only healthy. The only thing we have a problem with is when the government funds open-source work. Government funding should be for work that is available to everybody. Open source is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works.
And ironically you just did exactly that by omitting the rest of his quote that was misleading, wrong and blatantly against free software as a whole because Steve Ballmer is a scumbag that wanted to sell malware and free software is the antithesis of that very practice. While doubling down on the negative connotations on copyleft used mostly by OSImp retards and cuck BSD developers.
Things like these is why I mostly ignore youtube Linuxtards like you and Nick, you're full of shit most of the time and all the way into open source corporate propaganda.
Here's the actual full Q/A from that interview.
Q: Do you view Linux and the open-source movement as a threat to Microsoft?
A: Yeah. It's good competition. It will force us to be innovative. It will force us to justify the prices and value that we deliver. And that's only healthy. The only thing we have a problem with is when the government funds open-source work. Government funding should be for work that is available to everybody. Open source is not available to commercial companies. The way the license is written, if you use any open-source software, you have to make the rest of your software open source. If the government wants to put something in the public domain, it should. Linux is not in the public domain. Linux is a cancer that attaches itself in an intellectual property sense to everything it touches. That's the way that the license works.