papafigos on Nostr: lol no. We don't talk about it because there is no hope for a decent privacy solution ...

lol no. We don't talk about it because there is no hope for a decent privacy solution on a transparent chain and other than acknowledging this simple truth when someone who can only see black and white yet again puts out false information that will inevitably lead less knowledgeable people astray, there is generally no point in doing so.

Because such people are not open to rational arguments.

Try to pay for a house with payjojned coins and see how it goes (you've tainted the seller's coins now), try to deposit to an exchange and see how it goes.

And yeah sure, you can do this and you can do that, a dozen things, and you can avoid using this or that service as a workaround for the inherent and inescapable flaws of the underlying technology. How do you think those of us who've tried to manage all that complexity found the alternative?

Payjoin is ridiculously underwhelming compared to ring signatures in Monero and ring signatures in Monero are ridiculoualy underwhelming compared to what FCMPs will bring in the medium-term.

You'll find a few hard-headed stubborn Monero maxis that are the mirror image of toxic bitcoin maxis minus the dramatic gains and the strength in numbers. They are just as deluded in seeing no value in #bitcoin as the bitcoin maxis are in not seeing the value in #monero

It would be better for everyone who cares about freedom and privacy if this constant nonsense would stop.

#monero #bitcoin #privacy