Andrew Zonenberg on Nostr: npub178rvt…sqekt npub16sn5m…fnt0l Yeah that would definitely be interesting to ...
npub178rvtslm3qykq8uy5afswta2qz5pk9atjxsepht4x8ldddssp6kq4sqekt (npub178r…qekt) npub16sn5mtvnqqkt0l9fddkj5gwnjwh0r50dwpffk03tngt64ng22r6qmfnt0l (npub16sn…nt0l) Yeah that would definitely be interesting to see litigated.
In a one-party state they can claim that you consented by accepting the app's ToS which, while morally very dark gray, might have enough of a legal leg to stand on that it has a chance of holding up in court.
My non-lawyer's reading of 18 USC 2511 1(a) seems to prohibit the interception without using the word "content" though?
In a one-party state they can claim that you consented by accepting the app's ToS which, while morally very dark gray, might have enough of a legal leg to stand on that it has a chance of holding up in court.
My non-lawyer's reading of 18 USC 2511 1(a) seems to prohibit the interception without using the word "content" though?