Jeremy [ARCHIVE] on Nostr: π Original date posted:2019-06-01 π Original message:Hi All, ...
π
Original date posted:2019-06-01
π Original message:Hi All,
OP_CHECKOUTPUTSHASHVERIFY is retracted in favor of OP_SECURETHEBAG*.
OP_SECURETHEBAG does more or less the same thing, but fixes malleability
issues and lifts the single output restriction to a known number of inputs
restriction.
OP_CHECKOUTPUTSVERIFY had some issues with malleability of version and
locktime. OP_SECURETHEBAG commits to both of these values.
OP_SECURETHEBAG also lifts the restriction that OP_CHECKOUTPUTSVERIFY had
to be spent as only a single input, and instead just commits to the number
of inputs. This allows for more flexibility, but keeps it easy to get the
same single output restriction.
BIP:
https://github.com/JeremyRubin/bips/blob/op-secure-the-bag/bip-secure-the-bag.mediawiki
Implementation: https://github.com/JeremyRubin/bitcoin/tree/secure_the_bag
A particularly useful topic of discussion is how best to eliminate the
PUSHDATA and treat OP_SECURETHEBAG like a pushdata directly. I thought
about how the interpreter works and is implemented and couldn't come up
with something noninvasive.
Thank you for your review and discussion,
Jeremy
* Plus the name is better
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190531/b1cc3a48/attachment-0001.html>
π Original message:Hi All,
OP_CHECKOUTPUTSHASHVERIFY is retracted in favor of OP_SECURETHEBAG*.
OP_SECURETHEBAG does more or less the same thing, but fixes malleability
issues and lifts the single output restriction to a known number of inputs
restriction.
OP_CHECKOUTPUTSVERIFY had some issues with malleability of version and
locktime. OP_SECURETHEBAG commits to both of these values.
OP_SECURETHEBAG also lifts the restriction that OP_CHECKOUTPUTSVERIFY had
to be spent as only a single input, and instead just commits to the number
of inputs. This allows for more flexibility, but keeps it easy to get the
same single output restriction.
BIP:
https://github.com/JeremyRubin/bips/blob/op-secure-the-bag/bip-secure-the-bag.mediawiki
Implementation: https://github.com/JeremyRubin/bitcoin/tree/secure_the_bag
A particularly useful topic of discussion is how best to eliminate the
PUSHDATA and treat OP_SECURETHEBAG like a pushdata directly. I thought
about how the interpreter works and is implemented and couldn't come up
with something noninvasive.
Thank you for your review and discussion,
Jeremy
* Plus the name is better
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/attachments/20190531/b1cc3a48/attachment-0001.html>