Wolf480pl on Nostr: nprofile1q…8qx0v And if we want to get pedantic: before they changed it, the ...
nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqxmjvgtqxglge7p80j26tk9h8nvzquwmxevy94kup2gger2sl67mqy8qx0v (nprofile…qx0v)
And if we want to get pedantic:
before they changed it, the article's logic was like
1. good hash functions are preimage resistant
2. we found a second preimage attack
3. we were only able to do it because this is not a good hash function
However, preimage resistance does not imply second preimage resistance. And even if it did, the reader doesn't necessarily know it. So 1 should've been:
1. good hash functions are second preimage resistant
And if we want to get pedantic:
before they changed it, the article's logic was like
1. good hash functions are preimage resistant
2. we found a second preimage attack
3. we were only able to do it because this is not a good hash function
However, preimage resistance does not imply second preimage resistance. And even if it did, the reader doesn't necessarily know it. So 1 should've been:
1. good hash functions are second preimage resistant