npub1m6…2mzj9 on Nostr: he's done like a dozen of them and each time makes the same arguments even when ...

he's done like a dozen of them and each time makes the same arguments even when they've been refuted or he's conceded the points previously to other people and is banking that the audience isn't aware. would be helpful to slim shady it and just address each argument he's previously made beforehand in like a written blog post, and ask if there's any new or different arguments he'd like to make for this debate and stick to those.

e.g. in at least 3 debates he's done he makes the argument that Bitcoin isn't scarce because it can be forked. In each debate his opponent clearly demonstrates why he's wrong and he drops it. but then he comes back in the next debate and makes the same argument, knowing he's wrong but hoping it won't get addressed.